Mansplaining in Academia: Narratives of Women Faculty Members at a University in Cagayan de Oro City

Abstract

This study delves into the experiences of women faculty members at a tertiary university in Cagayan de Oro City who have faced “mansplaining” (a portmanteau of the words “man” and “explain”), a form of gendered communication where men condescendingly explain concepts to women, presuming their ignorance. Employing a descriptive phenomenological approach, I analyzed interviews to uncover the ways mansplaining occurs within academic settings as well as the meanings that women faculty attach to their experiences. Five emergent themes were identified, highlighting the varied manifestations of mansplaining, such as male superiors questioning women's expertise and interrupting them during discussions, which undermines women's contributions and breeds a culture of undervaluation.

These encounters significantly affect women's motivation, engagement, and self-perception, instilling doubt about their capabilities and place within the academic sphere. The participants in this study refrained from attributing mansplaining solely to gender dynamics. Instead, they highlighted the critical need for explicit policies that delineate roles and responsibilities while ensuring that women have the autonomy to express their ideas and assert their expertise confidently, even when diverging from male colleagues' perspectives. These approaches can mitigate mansplaining by fostering an inclusive environment that values and respects women's expertise.